<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (9) TMI 104 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284825</link>
    <description>A partial partition of a Hindu undivided family&#039;s interest in a partnership can be evidenced by entries in the family books dividing the capital into equal shares and crediting the members accordingly; division by metes and bounds is not necessary for such an asset. The absence of matching entries in the firm&#039;s books does not negate the partition, because the sons do not become partners merely by reason of the family partition and the karta&#039;s continued participation is no longer in a representative capacity. Once the interest is divided, the resulting share income is assessable in the hands of the divided members, not the undivided family.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 15:10:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (9) TMI 104 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284825</link>
      <description>A partial partition of a Hindu undivided family&#039;s interest in a partnership can be evidenced by entries in the family books dividing the capital into equal shares and crediting the members accordingly; division by metes and bounds is not necessary for such an asset. The absence of matching entries in the firm&#039;s books does not negate the partition, because the sons do not become partners merely by reason of the family partition and the karta&#039;s continued participation is no longer in a representative capacity. Once the interest is divided, the resulting share income is assessable in the hands of the divided members, not the undivided family.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>