<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (6) TMI 54 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284824</link>
    <description>Rule 10(2)(b) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 applies only where an employee is convicted for an offence punishable under Indian law in force and sentenced to imprisonment exceeding forty-eight hours. Reading &quot;offence&quot; and &quot;any law for the time being in force&quot; in light of the constitutional scheme, the Calcutta HC held that the provision refers to Indian law, not foreign law, because criminal jurisdiction is territorial and local. A foreign conviction for conduct abroad may indicate misconduct or moral turpitude, but it cannot by itself constitute the statutory basis for deemed suspension under Rule 10(2)(b).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 14:34:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (6) TMI 54 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284824</link>
      <description>Rule 10(2)(b) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 applies only where an employee is convicted for an offence punishable under Indian law in force and sentenced to imprisonment exceeding forty-eight hours. Reading &quot;offence&quot; and &quot;any law for the time being in force&quot; in light of the constitutional scheme, the Calcutta HC held that the provision refers to Indian law, not foreign law, because criminal jurisdiction is territorial and local. A foreign conviction for conduct abroad may indicate misconduct or moral turpitude, but it cannot by itself constitute the statutory basis for deemed suspension under Rule 10(2)(b).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>