<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 628 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284823</link>
    <description>Where tax authorities have not made a conclusive finding on the true nature and use of goods, a revisional court may decline to decide classification itself and remit the matter for fresh determination. Here, the record did not establish whether GLA-120 capsules were an unclassified product, dietary supplement, or medicine, and no authority had examined the commodity&#039;s essential character or purpose of sale. The court therefore set aside the assessment orders and the Tribunal&#039;s order and directed reconsideration by the assessing authority, with a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee before a fresh order is passed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 628 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284823</link>
      <description>Where tax authorities have not made a conclusive finding on the true nature and use of goods, a revisional court may decline to decide classification itself and remit the matter for fresh determination. Here, the record did not establish whether GLA-120 capsules were an unclassified product, dietary supplement, or medicine, and no authority had examined the commodity&#039;s essential character or purpose of sale. The court therefore set aside the assessment orders and the Tribunal&#039;s order and directed reconsideration by the assessing authority, with a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee before a fresh order is passed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>