<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 5 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20706</link>
    <description>Estimated capital gains tax was deductible in computing wealth, following the court&#039;s earlier binding view on the point, and that question was answered against the assessee. A compulsory deposit under the Compulsory Deposit Scheme was not an annuity within section 2(e)(2)(ii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, because the statutory exclusion applies only to a fixed periodic sum not commutable into a lump sum; the scheme involved repayment of deposited capital with interest and was treated as a deposit for wealth-tax purposes. The amount was therefore includible in the assessee&#039;s net wealth, and that question was also answered against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:02:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 5 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20706</link>
      <description>Estimated capital gains tax was deductible in computing wealth, following the court&#039;s earlier binding view on the point, and that question was answered against the assessee. A compulsory deposit under the Compulsory Deposit Scheme was not an annuity within section 2(e)(2)(ii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, because the statutory exclusion applies only to a fixed periodic sum not commutable into a lump sum; the scheme involved repayment of deposited capital with interest and was treated as a deposit for wealth-tax purposes. The amount was therefore includible in the assessee&#039;s net wealth, and that question was also answered against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>