https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389600 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking relief from coercive action and refund of customs duty deposited during an investigation under the Customs Act, 1962. The court found insufficient evidence of coercion in the deposits made by the petitioner and emphasized the ongoing nature of the investigation. It was deemed premature to order a refund at that stage, with the court advising the petitioner to pursue recovery through a suit if necessary. The decision underscored the importance of a comprehensive assessment of legal and factual aspects before granting relief or refunds in such cases. en-us Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Dec 2019 12:30:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389600 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking relief from coercive action and refund of customs duty deposited during an investigation under the Customs Act, 1962. The court found insufficient evidence of coercion in the deposits made by the petitioner and emphasized the ongoing nature of the investigation. It was deemed premature to order a refund at that stage, with the court advising the petitioner to pursue recovery through a suit if necessary. The decision underscored the importance of a comprehensive assessment of legal and factual aspects before granting relief or refunds in such cases. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389600