<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 482 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389599</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the Custom Broker (CB) license, citing lack of substantial evidence and emphasizing misclassification rather than misdeclaration. It found the CB had acted diligently and advised the client appropriately. The appeal against revocation was partly allowed, while the appeal against suspension was dismissed as inconsequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 482 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389599</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the Custom Broker (CB) license, citing lack of substantial evidence and emphasizing misclassification rather than misdeclaration. It found the CB had acted diligently and advised the client appropriately. The appeal against revocation was partly allowed, while the appeal against suspension was dismissed as inconsequential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>