<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 480 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389597</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant was not responsible for the Collective Investment Scheme (CIS) or its execution. The penalty imposed was considered excessive and not supported by the SEBI Act. Therefore, the Tribunal quashed the order and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 480 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389597</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant was not responsible for the Collective Investment Scheme (CIS) or its execution. The penalty imposed was considered excessive and not supported by the SEBI Act. Therefore, the Tribunal quashed the order and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>