<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 479 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389596</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was refused in a matter involving allegations of cheating and criminal breach of trust arising from a real estate project. The court relied on the alleged diversion of funds, disputed transactions, the petitioner&#039;s active role in the company, the early stage of investigation, and non-production of relevant documents. It accepted the investigating agency&#039;s case that custodial interrogation was necessary to trace the money trail, uncover the alleged conspiracy, recover the cheated amount, and identify the beneficiaries of the proceeds. On those circumstances, pre-arrest protection was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 479 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389596</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was refused in a matter involving allegations of cheating and criminal breach of trust arising from a real estate project. The court relied on the alleged diversion of funds, disputed transactions, the petitioner&#039;s active role in the company, the early stage of investigation, and non-production of relevant documents. It accepted the investigating agency&#039;s case that custodial interrogation was necessary to trace the money trail, uncover the alleged conspiracy, recover the cheated amount, and identify the beneficiaries of the proceeds. On those circumstances, pre-arrest protection was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>