<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 468 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389585</link>
    <description>The article addresses whether delay in an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 can be condoned under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. It notes competing Supreme Court views on that question and explains that, because the issue remained debatable and had not been fully considered when leave to withdraw the writ petition was granted, the earlier order was recalled on review. The matter was thus reopened for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 468 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389585</link>
      <description>The article addresses whether delay in an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 can be condoned under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. It notes competing Supreme Court views on that question and explains that, because the issue remained debatable and had not been fully considered when leave to withdraw the writ petition was granted, the earlier order was recalled on review. The matter was thus reopened for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>