https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389585 Review of the withdrawal order was allowed because competing Supreme Court positions on whether delay in filing an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 may be condoned under the Limitation Act required merits consideration. One position denied the availability of condonation, while another supported a different view, leaving the issue debatable. The earlier order granting withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to pursue an appeal was recalled, and the proceeding was reopened to determine the availability of condonation of delay under the MVAT appellate regime on merits. en-us Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389585 Review of the withdrawal order was allowed because competing Supreme Court positions on whether delay in filing an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 may be condoned under the Limitation Act required merits consideration. One position denied the availability of condonation, while another supported a different view, leaving the issue debatable. The earlier order granting withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to pursue an appeal was recalled, and the proceeding was reopened to determine the availability of condonation of delay under the MVAT appellate regime on merits. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389585