https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284818 A writ challenge to a Tribunal order dismissing a second appeal for non-prosecution was not examined on merits because a specific statutory appellate remedy was available under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. At the petitioner's request, the High Court permitted withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to pursue the prescribed appeal. The substantive contention that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to pass an ex parte dismissal was left undecided, and no merits adjudication was undertaken. en-us Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:41:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284818 A writ challenge to a Tribunal order dismissing a second appeal for non-prosecution was not examined on merits because a specific statutory appellate remedy was available under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. At the petitioner's request, the High Court permitted withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to pursue the prescribed appeal. The substantive contention that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to pass an ex parte dismissal was left undecided, and no merits adjudication was undertaken. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284818