<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1498 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284804</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by upholding the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to allow the deduction on interest income from nationalized banks under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. However, the Tribunal reversed the decision on the deduction for profit from holiday homes, disallowing it under the same section.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:40:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1498 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284804</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by upholding the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to allow the deduction on interest income from nationalized banks under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. However, the Tribunal reversed the decision on the deduction for profit from holiday homes, disallowing it under the same section.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>