<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 455 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389572</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing a re-adjudication by the Assessing Officer to establish the authenticity of transactions and compliance with legal requirements. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing factual evidence, fair assessment procedures, and opportunities for the assessee to substantiate claims in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:33:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 455 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389572</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing a re-adjudication by the Assessing Officer to establish the authenticity of transactions and compliance with legal requirements. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing factual evidence, fair assessment procedures, and opportunities for the assessee to substantiate claims in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>