<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 447 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389564</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty orders under Section 271(1)(c) for the assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11 due to invalid notices issued by the Assessing Officer. The notices did not specify whether the penalty was for &quot;concealment of particulars of income&quot; or &quot;furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.&quot; Citing precedents, the Tribunal found the penalty proceedings unsustainable and deleted the penalties. All appeals by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:08:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 447 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389564</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty orders under Section 271(1)(c) for the assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11 due to invalid notices issued by the Assessing Officer. The notices did not specify whether the penalty was for &quot;concealment of particulars of income&quot; or &quot;furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.&quot; Citing precedents, the Tribunal found the penalty proceedings unsustainable and deleted the penalties. All appeals by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>