<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 444 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389561</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the lack of intention to conceal income, the debatable nature of the issue, and the law of limitation. The judgment aimed to uphold fairness and justice in tax matters, considering the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 444 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389561</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the lack of intention to conceal income, the debatable nature of the issue, and the law of limitation. The judgment aimed to uphold fairness and justice in tax matters, considering the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>