<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Income Tax Officer&#039;s Notices Deemed Invalid Due to Jurisdictional Error; ACIT Holds Authority Since May 20, 2011.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50660</link>
    <description>Jurisdiction of AO - Selection of case for scrutiny - ACIT, Panvel acquired jurisdiction over assessee w.e.f. 20.05.2011, therefore, notices under section 143(2) issued by ITO, Panvel were invalid, leading to the impugned order becoming null &amp; void</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 13:27:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 13:27:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Income Tax Officer&#039;s Notices Deemed Invalid Due to Jurisdictional Error; ACIT Holds Authority Since May 20, 2011.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50660</link>
      <description>Jurisdiction of AO - Selection of case for scrutiny - ACIT, Panvel acquired jurisdiction over assessee w.e.f. 20.05.2011, therefore, notices under section 143(2) issued by ITO, Panvel were invalid, leading to the impugned order becoming null &amp; void</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 13:27:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>