<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1549 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284798</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act could not be sustained due to the defective notice under section 274 and the non-application of mind by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the penalty orders were cancelled, and the appeals by the assessee were allowed. The Tribunal applied the same reasoning to the appeal for the assessment year 2009-10, resulting in the cancellation of the penalty proceedings for both years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:49:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1549 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284798</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act could not be sustained due to the defective notice under section 274 and the non-application of mind by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the penalty orders were cancelled, and the appeals by the assessee were allowed. The Tribunal applied the same reasoning to the appeal for the assessment year 2009-10, resulting in the cancellation of the penalty proceedings for both years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>