<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 431 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389548</link>
    <description>After admission of an insolvency petition, withdrawal or settlement is not automatic because the process becomes a collective proceeding in rem. Where the Committee of Creditors has not yet been constituted, the Adjudicating Authority may exercise discretion to consider a withdrawal request directly, hearing the parties and assessing all relevant circumstances. The later amendment to the withdrawal regulation is consistent with this framework for withdrawal before and after constitution of the Committee of Creditors. On the facts described, the authority sought creditor responses and referred the matter to the Committee of Creditors, and no error was found in that approach; the subsequent disapproval of withdrawal by the Committee, which was not challenged, reinforced that result.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 431 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389548</link>
      <description>After admission of an insolvency petition, withdrawal or settlement is not automatic because the process becomes a collective proceeding in rem. Where the Committee of Creditors has not yet been constituted, the Adjudicating Authority may exercise discretion to consider a withdrawal request directly, hearing the parties and assessing all relevant circumstances. The later amendment to the withdrawal regulation is consistent with this framework for withdrawal before and after constitution of the Committee of Creditors. On the facts described, the authority sought creditor responses and referred the matter to the Committee of Creditors, and no error was found in that approach; the subsequent disapproval of withdrawal by the Committee, which was not challenged, reinforced that result.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>