<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 5 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20689</link>
    <description>The court held that the compensation of Rs. 60,000 for loss of earnings from a brick manufacturing business was not a revenue receipt as it was for the forced closure of the business due to land acquisition. The compensation for readymade earth was considered a revenue receipt. Only the interest accrued in the relevant year was taxable, not the entire amount. The rulings favored the assessee on the first and third questions and the Revenue on the second question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:51:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 5 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20689</link>
      <description>The court held that the compensation of Rs. 60,000 for loss of earnings from a brick manufacturing business was not a revenue receipt as it was for the forced closure of the business due to land acquisition. The compensation for readymade earth was considered a revenue receipt. Only the interest accrued in the relevant year was taxable, not the entire amount. The rulings favored the assessee on the first and third questions and the Revenue on the second question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>