<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 424 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389541</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s claim for CENVAT Credit on service tax for outward transportation beyond the place of removal was disallowed by the Court. The Court held that post-amendment, the credit is limited to services used only up to the place of removal, excluding transportation to the buyer&#039;s premises. The judgment aligned with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation, dismissing the appeal and affirming the lower authorities&#039; decision to disallow the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 424 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389541</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s claim for CENVAT Credit on service tax for outward transportation beyond the place of removal was disallowed by the Court. The Court held that post-amendment, the credit is limited to services used only up to the place of removal, excluding transportation to the buyer&#039;s premises. The judgment aligned with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation, dismissing the appeal and affirming the lower authorities&#039; decision to disallow the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>