<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 419 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389536</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with the demand for Cargo Handling Service being set aside, and the issue of Management, Maintenance or Repair Service demand being remanded for additional findings by the first appellate authority. The Tribunal found that shifting material within the factory premises does not amount to Cargo Handling Service, leading to the setting aside of the demand, interest, and penalties under that category.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:12:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 419 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389536</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with the demand for Cargo Handling Service being set aside, and the issue of Management, Maintenance or Repair Service demand being remanded for additional findings by the first appellate authority. The Tribunal found that shifting material within the factory premises does not amount to Cargo Handling Service, leading to the setting aside of the demand, interest, and penalties under that category.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>