https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284790 The Tribunal set aside the interest and penalty demands against the appellant, ruling in favor of the appellant due to the presence of sufficient balance in the CENVAT account during the disputed period and the absence of malafide intention. Citing relevant case law and legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the demands were not justified, ultimately allowing the appeal and overturning the impugned order confirming the demands. en-us Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Dec 2019 20:22:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284790 The Tribunal set aside the interest and penalty demands against the appellant, ruling in favor of the appellant due to the presence of sufficient balance in the CENVAT account during the disputed period and the absence of malafide intention. Citing relevant case law and legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the demands were not justified, ultimately allowing the appeal and overturning the impugned order confirming the demands. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284790