<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 413 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389530</link>
    <description>A petition challenging denial of credit raised two points: whether notice should issue and whether the credit could still be claimed after the prescribed time limit had expired. Notice of motion was issued and the matter was listed for further hearing. The Court also recorded that, if the petition succeeds, the petitioner would be entitled to claim the credit notwithstanding lapse of the time limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 413 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389530</link>
      <description>A petition challenging denial of credit raised two points: whether notice should issue and whether the credit could still be claimed after the prescribed time limit had expired. Notice of motion was issued and the matter was listed for further hearing. The Court also recorded that, if the petition succeeds, the petitioner would be entitled to claim the credit notwithstanding lapse of the time limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>