<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 67 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20682</link>
    <description>Estate duty valuation of land must account for material differences from comparable sales. A very large contiguous parcel cannot ordinarily be valued at the same rate as a much smaller plot, so an appropriate size-based deduction was required. Survey No. 39 was valued consistently with the assessee&#039;s own lower figure. Jamsie Villa also could not be valued at the full comparable rate because of its limited frontage, one-fifth ownership structure, tenants, licensees and pending litigation; these disadvantages justified a further reduction. The ratio is that comparable-sale rates cannot be mechanically applied where the subject property is materially less advantageous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:37:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 67 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20682</link>
      <description>Estate duty valuation of land must account for material differences from comparable sales. A very large contiguous parcel cannot ordinarily be valued at the same rate as a much smaller plot, so an appropriate size-based deduction was required. Survey No. 39 was valued consistently with the assessee&#039;s own lower figure. Jamsie Villa also could not be valued at the full comparable rate because of its limited frontage, one-fifth ownership structure, tenants, licensees and pending litigation; these disadvantages justified a further reduction. The ratio is that comparable-sale rates cannot be mechanically applied where the subject property is materially less advantageous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>