<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 401 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389518</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the notice issued under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) was invalid due to the failure to specify the exact charge, rendering the penalty order invalid. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the penalty proceedings were void ab initio.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 12:50:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 401 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389518</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the notice issued under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) was invalid due to the failure to specify the exact charge, rendering the penalty order invalid. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the penalty proceedings were void ab initio.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>