<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1170 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284770</link>
    <description>Where purchases are recorded in the books and sales are accepted, an estimated addition for notional initial investment is not justified because the case is not of unrecorded trading outside the books. However, the profit element embedded in inflated or bogus purchase entries may still be brought to tax. On these facts, the addition for initial investment was deleted, while the addition for gross profit was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 12:31:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1170 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284770</link>
      <description>Where purchases are recorded in the books and sales are accepted, an estimated addition for notional initial investment is not justified because the case is not of unrecorded trading outside the books. However, the profit element embedded in inflated or bogus purchase entries may still be brought to tax. On these facts, the addition for initial investment was deleted, while the addition for gross profit was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>