https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284769 A copyright development agreement was construed as effecting a present assignment where clause 7.1 stated that project materials and intellectual property rights were assigned, while clause 7.2 was treated as ancillary cooperation for enforcement and not as limiting the transfer. The omission of duration and territorial extent also attracted the statutory deeming rules applicable to copyright assignments. On interim relief, the appellant showed a prima facie copyright claim, the balance of convenience favoured protection against continued disputed use of the software and source code, and the alleged infringement gave rise to irreparable injury. The injunction vacating interim protection was therefore set aside and restraint was restored pending suit. en-us Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Dec 2019 11:35:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284769 A copyright development agreement was construed as effecting a present assignment where clause 7.1 stated that project materials and intellectual property rights were assigned, while clause 7.2 was treated as ancillary cooperation for enforcement and not as limiting the transfer. The omission of duration and territorial extent also attracted the statutory deeming rules applicable to copyright assignments. On interim relief, the appellant showed a prima facie copyright claim, the balance of convenience favoured protection against continued disputed use of the software and source code, and the alleged infringement gave rise to irreparable injury. The injunction vacating interim protection was therefore set aside and restraint was restored pending suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284769