<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 399 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389516</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, as the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax exceeded the scope of revision by delving into issues beyond the limited scrutiny conducted by the Assessing Officer. The judgment emphasized the restricted powers of the Assessing Officer during limited scrutiny assessments, leading to the conclusion that the Principal Commissioner&#039;s revision order was not legally sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 14:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 399 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389516</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, as the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax exceeded the scope of revision by delving into issues beyond the limited scrutiny conducted by the Assessing Officer. The judgment emphasized the restricted powers of the Assessing Officer during limited scrutiny assessments, leading to the conclusion that the Principal Commissioner&#039;s revision order was not legally sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>