<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 397 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389514</link>
    <description>Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 is treated as a beneficent remedy for speedy restoration of company property, and interim delivery may be ordered on a prima facie showing of wrongful withholding without waiting for final conviction under Section 630(1). A pending civil suit and temporary injunction do not bar Section 630 proceedings where the company is a separate legal entity and the respondent&#039;s claim lacks independent documentary support. The provision applies to wrongful withholding of property in lawful possession and does not require absolute title or prior service-perquisite allotment. Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC should not disturb such interlocutory orders absent exceptional illegality or jurisdictional defect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 12:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 397 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389514</link>
      <description>Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 is treated as a beneficent remedy for speedy restoration of company property, and interim delivery may be ordered on a prima facie showing of wrongful withholding without waiting for final conviction under Section 630(1). A pending civil suit and temporary injunction do not bar Section 630 proceedings where the company is a separate legal entity and the respondent&#039;s claim lacks independent documentary support. The provision applies to wrongful withholding of property in lawful possession and does not require absolute title or prior service-perquisite allotment. Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC should not disturb such interlocutory orders absent exceptional illegality or jurisdictional defect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>