https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389502 In a cheque dishonour prosecution, a cheque signed by the drawer remains valid even if the body of the cheque was filled by another person; the drawer's signature and the statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act are the material considerations, so handwriting comparison of the cheque body was not warranted on that basis. A petition under Section 482 CrPC could not be used as a disguised second revision after a prior revision had already been filed, because inherent jurisdiction cannot bypass the statutory bar absent illegality, perversity, or abuse of process. The orders below were upheld and interference was declined. en-us Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:02:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389502 In a cheque dishonour prosecution, a cheque signed by the drawer remains valid even if the body of the cheque was filled by another person; the drawer's signature and the statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act are the material considerations, so handwriting comparison of the cheque body was not warranted on that basis. A petition under Section 482 CrPC could not be used as a disguised second revision after a prior revision had already been filed, because inherent jurisdiction cannot bypass the statutory bar absent illegality, perversity, or abuse of process. The orders below were upheld and interference was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389502