<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1725 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284763</link>
    <description>The High Court decided to proceed with the appeal concerning taxability and excisability of goods, despite the referral of questions to a Larger Bench. The Court found that the issues referred were not pertinent to cases challenging Tribunal orders issued after the relevant amendment to Section 35L in 2014. Therefore, the Court scheduled the appeal hearing for December 5, 2018, distinguishing cases where the Tribunal&#039;s order postdated the amendment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:46:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1725 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284763</link>
      <description>The High Court decided to proceed with the appeal concerning taxability and excisability of goods, despite the referral of questions to a Larger Bench. The Court found that the issues referred were not pertinent to cases challenging Tribunal orders issued after the relevant amendment to Section 35L in 2014. Therefore, the Court scheduled the appeal hearing for December 5, 2018, distinguishing cases where the Tribunal&#039;s order postdated the amendment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>