<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (10) TMI 50 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284760</link>
    <description>Where a registered firm had been assessed under section 23(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 and its total income and partners&#039; shares had already been ascertained, the Department could not, in assessing a partner, adopt a different figure for the same firm&#039;s income to enlarge that partner&#039;s liability. The court treated section 23(5) as the governing machinery for assessing the firm and its partners for the relevant year, and held that once the firm&#039;s total income was determined, that ascertainment bound the partner&#039;s assessment for the same accounting year. Partnership income outside the firm&#039;s assessed total income could not be separately brought to tax in the partner&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 16:42:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (10) TMI 50 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284760</link>
      <description>Where a registered firm had been assessed under section 23(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 and its total income and partners&#039; shares had already been ascertained, the Department could not, in assessing a partner, adopt a different figure for the same firm&#039;s income to enlarge that partner&#039;s liability. The court treated section 23(5) as the governing machinery for assessing the firm and its partners for the relevant year, and held that once the firm&#039;s total income was determined, that ascertainment bound the partner&#039;s assessment for the same accounting year. Partnership income outside the firm&#039;s assessed total income could not be separately brought to tax in the partner&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>