https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284758 Section 630 of the Companies Act was applied to accommodation provided by a company as part of service conditions, even where the company held only a leasehold interest rather than absolute ownership. The court also treated criminal prosecution for wrongful retention of premises as distinct from pending industrial dispute proceedings over dismissal, so the latter did not bar action for continued occupation after notice to vacate. A later petition under Section 482 CrPC could not be used to bypass an earlier failed revision absent exceptional grounds such as abuse of process or miscarriage of justice. On the evidence, the employer was a company and the prosecution and conviction were upheld. en-us Mon, 18 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Dec 2019 15:12:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284758 Section 630 of the Companies Act was applied to accommodation provided by a company as part of service conditions, even where the company held only a leasehold interest rather than absolute ownership. The court also treated criminal prosecution for wrongful retention of premises as distinct from pending industrial dispute proceedings over dismissal, so the latter did not bar action for continued occupation after notice to vacate. A later petition under Section 482 CrPC could not be used to bypass an earlier failed revision absent exceptional grounds such as abuse of process or miscarriage of justice. On the evidence, the employer was a company and the prosecution and conviction were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284758