<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (11) TMI 43 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284756</link>
    <description>Sale of the goodwill of a going concern at the business premises was treated as including the right to occupy the shop room as a monthly tenant. The sale proclamation and sale orders showed that what was sold was not confined to furniture and stock-in-trade, but the business goodwill attached to the very locality from which trade was conducted. On the facts, the shop room formed part of the commercial value sold, and the realisation of price supported that construction. Because the sale was not set aside through the available procedural remedy, its scope could not later be denied. The purchaser accordingly acquired the tenancy or right of occupation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 15:07:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (11) TMI 43 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284756</link>
      <description>Sale of the goodwill of a going concern at the business premises was treated as including the right to occupy the shop room as a monthly tenant. The sale proclamation and sale orders showed that what was sold was not confined to furniture and stock-in-trade, but the business goodwill attached to the very locality from which trade was conducted. On the facts, the shop room formed part of the commercial value sold, and the realisation of price supported that construction. Because the sale was not set aside through the available procedural remedy, its scope could not later be denied. The purchaser accordingly acquired the tenancy or right of occupation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>