<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 539 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284755</link>
    <description>Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 is a beneficent, quasi-criminal provision aimed at speedy recovery of company property wrongfully withheld after cessation of employment. Where the employee&#039;s right to retain the allotted property ends with employment and no independent right or express agreement to remain in possession is shown, the Court may direct delivery of possession under Section 630(2) without waiting for final conviction or conclusion of the criminal trial. On the facts, the company&#039;s right to recover the flat was clear and wrongful withholding was established, so the direction to vacate was upheld and immediate restoration of possession was secured.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 14:58:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 539 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284755</link>
      <description>Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 is a beneficent, quasi-criminal provision aimed at speedy recovery of company property wrongfully withheld after cessation of employment. Where the employee&#039;s right to retain the allotted property ends with employment and no independent right or express agreement to remain in possession is shown, the Court may direct delivery of possession under Section 630(2) without waiting for final conviction or conclusion of the criminal trial. On the facts, the company&#039;s right to recover the flat was clear and wrongful withholding was established, so the direction to vacate was upheld and immediate restoration of possession was secured.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>