<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 266 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284754</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that Section 37(3A) applied, despite film production starting in 1978. It found Section 37(3D) applicable, treating each film as a separate industrial undertaking. The Tribunal emphasized the need for full advertisement expenditure for new products like films, dismissing the departmental appeal based on Section 37(3D&#039;s applicability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 14:57:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 266 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284754</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that Section 37(3A) applied, despite film production starting in 1978. It found Section 37(3D) applicable, treating each film as a separate industrial undertaking. The Tribunal emphasized the need for full advertisement expenditure for new products like films, dismissing the departmental appeal based on Section 37(3D&#039;s applicability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>