<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 377 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389494</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice dated 18.10.2006 and the order dated 31.01.2007, ruling that the reopening of the assessment was unjustified as the income had already been assessed twice. The court found no basis for income escaping assessment and emphasized the necessity for strict adherence to the provisions of Section 147/148 for reopening assessments. The petition was allowed, and the court made no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 377 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389494</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice dated 18.10.2006 and the order dated 31.01.2007, ruling that the reopening of the assessment was unjustified as the income had already been assessed twice. The court found no basis for income escaping assessment and emphasized the necessity for strict adherence to the provisions of Section 147/148 for reopening assessments. The petition was allowed, and the court made no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>