https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389486 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer regarding the manufacturing stock disclosure issue. The Tribunal found the AO's addition unjustified, considering the explanations provided by the assessee regarding a typographical error in the audit report. The cross-objection filed by the assessee supporting the CIT(A)'s order was dismissed as academic. As a result, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objection, confirming the deletion of the addition. en-us Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Dec 2019 14:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389486 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer regarding the manufacturing stock disclosure issue. The Tribunal found the AO's addition unjustified, considering the explanations provided by the assessee regarding a typographical error in the audit report. The cross-objection filed by the assessee supporting the CIT(A)'s order was dismissed as academic. As a result, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objection, confirming the deletion of the addition. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389486