<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 348 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389465</link>
    <description>A CBDT circular enhancing the monetary limit for departmental appeals applies to pending appeals as well, with the earlier circular continuing only to the extent not substituted. Where the tax effect is below the prescribed threshold, the Revenue&#039;s appeal is not maintainable and is liable to be withdrawn or not pressed. The Tribunal followed the same approach adopted in the cited Supreme Court order and held that the appeal could not be pursued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 13:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 348 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389465</link>
      <description>A CBDT circular enhancing the monetary limit for departmental appeals applies to pending appeals as well, with the earlier circular continuing only to the extent not substituted. Where the tax effect is below the prescribed threshold, the Revenue&#039;s appeal is not maintainable and is liable to be withdrawn or not pressed. The Tribunal followed the same approach adopted in the cited Supreme Court order and held that the appeal could not be pursued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>