<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1548 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284743</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s exclusion of certain comparables for Arms Length Price determination, finding the decisions justified. Companies like Eclerx Services Ltd and Vishal Information Technologies Ltd were deemed incomparable due to their engagement in Knowledge Processing Outsourcing. Similarly, Infosys BPO and Wipro BPO Ltd were excluded based on their significant brand presence. The Court admitted questions of law on Accentia Technology Pvt. Ltd. and Bodhtree Consulting Ltd., scheduling further proceedings to address these issues. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was not successful, and the case was set for continued proceedings on 3rd April, 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 10:13:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1548 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284743</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s exclusion of certain comparables for Arms Length Price determination, finding the decisions justified. Companies like Eclerx Services Ltd and Vishal Information Technologies Ltd were deemed incomparable due to their engagement in Knowledge Processing Outsourcing. Similarly, Infosys BPO and Wipro BPO Ltd were excluded based on their significant brand presence. The Court admitted questions of law on Accentia Technology Pvt. Ltd. and Bodhtree Consulting Ltd., scheduling further proceedings to address these issues. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was not successful, and the case was set for continued proceedings on 3rd April, 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>