https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389440 The court upheld the jurisdictional transfer of the case to Mumbai, rejecting the petitioner's objections regarding hindering refund proceedings. It was determined that the transfer was justified, with consent obtained from the competent authority as required by law. The court assured that the transfer would not impede refund processing and reiterated compliance with earlier court orders related to refunds. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed, ruling in favor of the respondent and upholding the transfer decision. en-us Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Dec 2019 14:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389440 The court upheld the jurisdictional transfer of the case to Mumbai, rejecting the petitioner's objections regarding hindering refund proceedings. It was determined that the transfer was justified, with consent obtained from the competent authority as required by law. The court assured that the transfer would not impede refund processing and reiterated compliance with earlier court orders related to refunds. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed, ruling in favor of the respondent and upholding the transfer decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389440