<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 310 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice under Section 271(1)(c) invalid due to lack of specificity in specifying the charge. Additionally, the penalty based on estimated income was deemed unsustainable, leading to the deletion of the penalty and allowing the appeal by the assessee. The decision was pronounced on 27/11/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2019 13:53:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 310 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice under Section 271(1)(c) invalid due to lack of specificity in specifying the charge. Additionally, the penalty based on estimated income was deemed unsustainable, leading to the deletion of the penalty and allowing the appeal by the assessee. The decision was pronounced on 27/11/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>