<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 308 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389425</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act regarding unexplained creditors. The ITAT confirmed that the assessee had purchased shares from Parsoli Corporation Ltd., not Radharamana Holdings Pvt. Ltd., and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. Additionally, the ITAT rejected the application of Section 41(1) for ceased liability as there was no evidence of remission or cessation of liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2019 13:48:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 308 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389425</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act regarding unexplained creditors. The ITAT confirmed that the assessee had purchased shares from Parsoli Corporation Ltd., not Radharamana Holdings Pvt. Ltd., and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. Additionally, the ITAT rejected the application of Section 41(1) for ceased liability as there was no evidence of remission or cessation of liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>