<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 299 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389416</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the Petition, setting aside the impugned order by the Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, and remanded the matter for a fresh consideration of the jurisdictional issue raised by the petitioner. The Court emphasized the importance of properly considering previous decisions cited by the parties and directed the Commissioner to dispose of the matter expeditiously within six weeks of the parties filing the authenticated copy of the Order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 299 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389416</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the Petition, setting aside the impugned order by the Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, and remanded the matter for a fresh consideration of the jurisdictional issue raised by the petitioner. The Court emphasized the importance of properly considering previous decisions cited by the parties and directed the Commissioner to dispose of the matter expeditiously within six weeks of the parties filing the authenticated copy of the Order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>