<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 295 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389412</link>
    <description>The appeal of M/s Mulchand M. Zaveri was partly allowed, reducing the redemption fine but upholding the reclassification, confiscation, and penalties. The appeal of the partner was allowed, setting aside the separate penalty imposed on him. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the natural origin of &#039;ores&#039; and the inadmissibility of artificially created substances under the claimed exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 295 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389412</link>
      <description>The appeal of M/s Mulchand M. Zaveri was partly allowed, reducing the redemption fine but upholding the reclassification, confiscation, and penalties. The appeal of the partner was allowed, setting aside the separate penalty imposed on him. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the natural origin of &#039;ores&#039; and the inadmissibility of artificially created substances under the claimed exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>