https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389408 The court found in favor of the petitioner, holding that the application under Article 227 was maintainable. It ruled that Rule 55 of the NCLT Rules did not apply to IBC proceedings and criticized the NCLT's biased refusal to allow the corporate debtor to file a supplementary affidavit. The court set aside the impugned order, permitting the filing of the supplementary affidavit and instructing the NCLT to consider it in the main matter. Fair play and impartiality in judicial proceedings were emphasized by the court. en-us Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Dec 2019 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389408 The court found in favor of the petitioner, holding that the application under Article 227 was maintainable. It ruled that Rule 55 of the NCLT Rules did not apply to IBC proceedings and criticized the NCLT's biased refusal to allow the corporate debtor to file a supplementary affidavit. The court set aside the impugned order, permitting the filing of the supplementary affidavit and instructing the NCLT to consider it in the main matter. Fair play and impartiality in judicial proceedings were emphasized by the court. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389408