https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389406 The Court set aside the disqualification order under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act 2013, emphasizing procedural fairness, limitations of retrospective application, and proportionality in disqualification measures. The judgment highlighted errors in applying disqualification retrospectively and the necessity of proper notice to directors. It clarified that directors in compliant companies should not be disqualified without prior notice. The decision allowed the Petitioner to seek re-appointment or appointment as Directors in other companies without hindrance, stressing adherence to natural justice principles in such cases. en-us Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389406 The Court set aside the disqualification order under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act 2013, emphasizing procedural fairness, limitations of retrospective application, and proportionality in disqualification measures. The judgment highlighted errors in applying disqualification retrospectively and the necessity of proper notice to directors. It clarified that directors in compliant companies should not be disqualified without prior notice. The decision allowed the Petitioner to seek re-appointment or appointment as Directors in other companies without hindrance, stressing adherence to natural justice principles in such cases. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389406