<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1760 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284734</link>
    <description>The Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order in a writ petition involving interpretation of agreements and an interim order restraining payments. It directed the sixth respondent to deposit a specified amount from released funds to safeguard both parties&#039; interests. The Court emphasized the need for prompt resolution, clarified it did not express an opinion on the merits, and instructed parties to present relevant records for final orders. The bank was allowed to seek modification of the garnishee order, enabling defendants to raise objections. The case was disposed of, leaving room for further actions by the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2019 12:21:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1760 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284734</link>
      <description>The Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order in a writ petition involving interpretation of agreements and an interim order restraining payments. It directed the sixth respondent to deposit a specified amount from released funds to safeguard both parties&#039; interests. The Court emphasized the need for prompt resolution, clarified it did not express an opinion on the merits, and instructed parties to present relevant records for final orders. The bank was allowed to seek modification of the garnishee order, enabling defendants to raise objections. The case was disposed of, leaving room for further actions by the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>