https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389398 The tribunal allowed the appeals of M/s Om Synthetics and M/s Thakar Traders, setting aside duty demands and penalties. It ruled that the lack of corroborative evidence and the eligibility for SSI exemption based on co-ownership of the "Bhayani" trademark supported this decision. The tribunal emphasized discrepancies in evidence, including contradictory statements and insufficient proof of clandestine removal. The appeals were granted with consequential reliefs, highlighting the importance of proper evidence in duty demand cases. en-us Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Dec 2019 10:44:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389398 The tribunal allowed the appeals of M/s Om Synthetics and M/s Thakar Traders, setting aside duty demands and penalties. It ruled that the lack of corroborative evidence and the eligibility for SSI exemption based on co-ownership of the "Bhayani" trademark supported this decision. The tribunal emphasized discrepancies in evidence, including contradictory statements and insufficient proof of clandestine removal. The appeals were granted with consequential reliefs, highlighting the importance of proper evidence in duty demand cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389398