https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284727 The High Court upheld the trial court's decision to reject the application for voice sample comparison in a case involving a dishonored cheque. Emphasizing the stringent requirements of Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act for electronic evidence admissibility, the court found the petitioner failed to establish the authenticity of the recordings. The court dismissed the petition, directing the trial court to conclude the trial promptly, highlighting the importance of authenticating electronic evidence before admission. en-us Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Dec 2019 10:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284727 The High Court upheld the trial court's decision to reject the application for voice sample comparison in a case involving a dishonored cheque. Emphasizing the stringent requirements of Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act for electronic evidence admissibility, the court found the petitioner failed to establish the authenticity of the recordings. The court dismissed the petition, directing the trial court to conclude the trial promptly, highlighting the importance of authenticating electronic evidence before admission. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284727