<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 20 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20652</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the amount spent to acquire the right to use a railway siding constituted a capital asset under section 80J. Although the assessee did not own the railway siding, the acquired interest was deemed valuable and not depreciable. Consequently, the court allowed the inclusion of the sum in the capital computation but denied the claim for development rebate and depreciation due to the lack of ownership of the asset.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:09:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 20 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20652</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the amount spent to acquire the right to use a railway siding constituted a capital asset under section 80J. Although the assessee did not own the railway siding, the acquired interest was deemed valuable and not depreciable. Consequently, the court allowed the inclusion of the sum in the capital computation but denied the claim for development rebate and depreciation due to the lack of ownership of the asset.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>